⏳ Loading example…
🗂️
Categorical
McNemar's Test — Paired Binary Data
Paired-proportions test for before/after certification pass rates (n=20). Contrasts the uncorrected chi-square (p=.035) against SPSS/R's default continuity-corrected result (p=.070).
📊 χ²(1) = 3.27 (corrected), p = .070
Step-by-step solution
🗂️ 32 · McNemar's Test — Paired Binary Data
Did a Training Course Change the Certification Pass Rate?
Categorical
Research Question:
20 candidates took a certification exam (pass/fail), completed a 6-week training course, then took the exam again. Did the pass rate change? Because the same 20 people were measured twice, a chi-square test of independence is wrong here — McNemar's test is the correct paired alternative.
| After: Pass | After: Fail | |
|---|---|---|
| Before: Pass | 6 (a) | 2 (b) |
| Before: Fail | 9 (c) | 3 (d) |
Only the discordant cells (b, c) carry information
-
1Identify the discordant pairs: b = 2 candidates went pass→fail; c = 9 went fail→pass. The concordant cells (a=6 pass/pass, d=3 fail/fail) contribute no information about change and are dropped.
-
2Uncorrected χ²:
-
3Continuity-corrected χ² (b+c = 11 < 25 → apply it): SPSS and R's stats::mcnemar.test() apply this correction by default whenever b+c is small, precisely because it matters here: the correction flips the conclusion from p = .035 to p = .070.
-
4Decision rule: Report the corrected result: p = .070 > .05 → fail to reject H₀ → the pass-rate change is not statistically significant, despite 9 candidates improving against only 2 regressing. With this few discordant pairs, the uncorrected test (p = .035) overstates the evidence.
3.27
χ² (corrected)
.070
p (cc)
4.5
OR (b/c)
20
N
🟢 Not significant (corrected) — χ²(1) = 3.27, p = .070. The uncorrected χ²(1) = 4.46, p = .035 overstates the evidence for change.
APA-7
A McNemar's test with continuity correction indicated no statistically significant change in certification pass rate following training, χ²(1) = 3.27, p = .070 (OR = 4.50). The uncorrected test, χ²(1) = 4.46, p = .035, would have overstated this evidence.